| Persistent
Organic Polltants Factsheet
Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs) are carbon-based
chemical compounds and mixtures,
that include industrial chemicals,
pesticides like DDT, and unwanted
byproducts like Dioxins. Most POPs
are products and by-products of
human industry and are of relatively
recent origin.
The
story so far:
Concern is growing about POPs because
they accumulate in body fat and
in the environment. The problem
is worse in colder climates as they
breakdown more slowly at lower temperatures.
As they can be transported through
both air and sea, the problem of
POPs crosses national boundaries.
Traces of these chemicals can be
found in most human beings and all
kinds of wildlife, even in isolated
parts of the globe. Although most
POPs are produced during the manufacture
of pesticides and other chlorinated
substances, others are formed unintentionally
due to incomplete combustion. Food
is the main way POPs enter our bodies.
There are many old stockpiles of
pesticides that leak, leach, and
evaporate into the air causing harmful
effects to the environment. POPs
are banned in most countries because
of their harmful effects. Despite
this they are still being used as
pesticides in many countries.
POPs- The dirty dozen Of the many
existing POPs, the following twelve
are currently being studied:
• Aldrin is applied to soil
to kill termites, grasshoppers,
corn rootworm, and other insect
pests. It can kill birds, fish,
and humans. It is permitted in certain
countries for agricultural or public
health purposes.
• Chlordane is used to control
termites and as a broad-spectrum
insecticides on a range of agricultural
crops. It may affect the human immune
system and is classified as a possible
human carcinogen. It is banned or
severely restricted in dozens of
countries.
• DDT was widely used during
World War II to protect soldiers
and civilians from malaria, typhus,
and other diseases spread by insects.
Birds' eggshells become thinner
due to DDT, and it has been detected
in breast milk. 34 countries have
banned it, while 34 others severely
restrict its use. It is still manufactured
in India, China, and Mexico.
• Dieldrin is used to control
termites and textile pests. In Kenya
it is used for banding coffee trees.
Dieldrin is highly toxic to fish
and other aquatic animals. Many
countries permit its import, including
Ethiopia and Sri Lanka.
• Dioxins are produced unintentionally,
due to incomplete combustion, and
also emitted when waste is burnt
in incinerators. It can cause cancer
and birth defects, even in extremely
tiny amounts.
• Endrin is sprayed on the
leaves of crops like cotton and
grains to control rodents such as
mice and moles. It is highly toxic
to fish. It is used in Dominic Republic
and manufactured in the United States.
• Furan compounds are produced
unintentionally and are classified
as possible carcinogens.
• Heptachlor is used to kill
insects, termites, cotton insects,
grass hoppers, other crop pests,
and malaria-carrying mosquitoes.
It is responsible for the decline
of several wild bird populations,
and is considered to be a human
carcinogen. Some two dozen countries
have either banned or severely restricted
its use.
• Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
was introduced in 1945 to treat
seeds and was widely used to control
wheat bunt. It is also a byproduct
of the manufacture of some industrial
chemicals. People exposed to HCBs
can develop photosensitive skin
sores, colic, and poor health. It
is banned in many counties including
Australia, Belgium, United Kingdom,
and Turkey.
• Mirex is used to combat
fire ants and termites and as a
fire retardant in plastics, rubber,
and electrical goods. It is classified
as possible human carcinogen and
is toxic to several plants and fish.
• Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs) are used in industry as heat
exchange fluids, in electric transformers
and capacitors, and as additives
in paint, carbon-less copy paper,
and plastics. They are toxic to
fish, suppress the human immune
system and are listed as probable
human carcinogens. Countries which
ban PCBs include Austria, Germany,
Switzerland, and the US.
• Toxaphene is used on cotton
grains, cereal grains, fruits, nuts,
and vegetables. It is highly toxic
to fish and a possible human carcinogen.
China, Pakistan, and Nicaragua manufacture
toxaphene but it its banned in other
countries like Austria and Belgium.
How do POPs
affect us?
POPs create risks
which cannot be managed, so they
must be eliminated. The United Nations
has called them 'a serious threat
to human health'. Disruption of
hormones in humans and wildlife
can be caused by POPs, and they
are associated with an increase
in disorders of the
reproductive organs.
POPs are associated in particular
with impacts on women such as breast
cancer. Babies are exposed to POPs
in the womb, with risks to their
potential and future quality of
life. POPs have been classified
as contaminants of human milk since
1996.
How do POPs
reach us?
Food is the main
way POPs can enter our bodies. As
they are soluble in fat and not
easily broken down in the body,
they accumulate in the fatty tissues
of animals and humans. As one animal
eats another, the level of POPs
in fat increases. This means that
the highest levels are found in
predator animals at the top of the
food chain, such as polar bear,
seals, toothed whales, birds of
prey, and humans.
Impact
on the environment
All aspects of the
environment can become contaminated
by POPs. For instance, spraying
pesticides containing POPs on to
crops contaminates vegetation and
soils, discharges from factories
making POPs contaminates rivers,
and if smoke which is released from
incinerators and factories, contains
POPs it contaminates the air.
POP pesticides were introduced in
Pakistan in the 1950s when the federal
government began importing DDT and
BHC for malaria control and agriculture.
Later, large qualities of Dieldrin
and Aldrin were also added to the
list. When, in the mid-to-late 1970s,
the pesticide business was privatized
and multinationals entered the market,
imports of all pesticides increased
even further. This has resulted
in a situation where degrading stockpiles
of extremely hazardous pesticides
are littered across the country.
Officially, all POP pesticides except
Chlordane are banned for use and
import, with BYHC being banned in
1997. However, in April 1998, Greenpeace
as able to confirm the availability
of pesticides marketed as Dieldrin,
DDT, BHC and heptachlor.
What can we
do?
Coordination
Improved coordination between north
and south and other regional blocks
is needed to promote a strong and
effective treaty leading to the
elimination of existing POPs and
the adoption of the precautionary
principle for future POPs. Currently,
inter-governmental negotiations
are being held to draft a legally
binding document to address the
twelve Priority POPs. Developed
countries, influenced by industry,
are striving for a weak treaty.
Educational programs
As there is lack of public awareness,
educational programs should start
to help people gain more knowledge
about the harmful effects of POPs.
Minimising releases and emissions
The discharge, manufacture and use
of the twelve POPs mentioned earlier
should be eliminated.
WWF's position
WWF's mission recognises
that controlling pollution is essential
to conserving biological diversity
and protect human health. WWF's
goal is to phase out and ban chemicals
like POPs, while working to identify
and implement acceptable, effective,
and affordable alternatives. WWF
seeks:
• National, multinational,
and international action to control
and, where necessary, ban, the use
of those chemicals which are already
known to have harmful effects.
• Greater use of the 'precautionary
principle' in public decision making.
Action should be taken to prevent
harm from chemicals even when definitive
scientific information is incomplete.
• Development and use of new
screens and tests to evaluate chemicals
for endocrine disruption.
• Increased public and private
sector investments in research on
endocrine disrupting chemicals.
• Legislative mechanisms which
lead to the substitution of hazardous
substances with less hazardous or
non-hazardous substances or processes,
without waiting for definitive proof
of harmful effects.
• Proactive efforts by manufacturers
and users of endocrine disrupting
substances to phase out their use.
" Development of policies and
principles which would help reduce
the use of POPs.
• Financial and technical
assistance to encourage adoption
of new technology that is less harmful
than POPs. Developed countries should
help developing countries to switch
over to safer alternatives.
For more information
on POPs, visit the following web
sites:
WWF-US: www.worldwildlife.org/toxics
WWF-Canada: www.wwfcanada.org
WWF-UK: www.wwf-uk.org
WWF-Germany: www.wwf.de
Other links
www.commonweal.org/pops.html
www.ipen.org
www.c3.org/chlorine_issues/health/pops.html
www.psr.org
www.chem.unep.ch/pops/default.html
Compiled and edited by Environmental
Pollution Unit, WWF- Pakistan
|