Water
Management & Development Schemes
Communities
In the Northern Areas
communities usually claim a right
to the usage of water flowing through
their village. A neighboring village
cannot use it without consent. In
the past traditional water rights
were established for irrigation
water but now it is also an important
issue in relation to piped water
supply schemes (Hussain and Langendijk,
1994).
The traditional water
supply schemes in the villages have
been managed by the villagers themselves
on a rational and equitable basis,
knowing that they are all equally
dependent on proper water distribution
for survival. Where water is scarcer,
strict rules and regulations are
applied and adhered to. Here water
rights form the basis for distribution
of water inside the villages. For
example in villages close to Gilgit
water use rights are given only
to those who own officially registered
“settled land” which
is agricultural land for which malia
(agricultural production tax) was
paid before the 1970s. Other farmers
cannot claim water for land but
can only use excess water. For example,
people of Jutial and Khomer have
joint right to the use of Jutial
nallah. In time of scarcity (March-May)
this right is strictly enforced.
Irrigation water to a part of Zulfiqar
colony is stopped as this settlement
does not have traditional user rights.
Therefore this colony relies on
a river lift scheme for drinking
purposes during this period (Hussain
and Langendijk, 1994). Nonetheless,
over time water rights have been
modified through mutual agreements
between old and new settlers in
the region’s villages.
In some villages
distribution systems are enforced
in every season except summer when
abundant water supplies are usually
available. In other villages enforcement
is only during April-May when farmers
need more water for wheat and barley
crops and melt waters have not yet
increased stream flow. Distribution
patterns often reflect village settlement
patterns. Early settlers enjoy slightly
better distribution but over time
agreements are reached to accommodate
newcomers and population growth
(Hussain and Langendijk, 1994).
Individual fields
have an allotted share of water
and receive it through field channels
which reach them through the opening
and closing of individual field
sluices (Kreutzmann, 2000). Additionally,
farmers take their irrigation turns
under the warabandi system. Each
farmer is given a particular day
and time to take water for irrigation,
but there may be informal exchange
of turns between proximate farmers
(Ahmed and Joyia, 2003). Order of
irrigation priority is generally
food crops, followed by fodder and
lastly by fruit trees with the first
two generally irrigated during the
day and the latter during the night.
Among food crops, priority is shown
for vegetables over food grains.
Kreutzmann (2000)
describes water management in central
Hunza. In villages here kinship
participation in the construction
of channels secures first priority
of access to the channels. However,
individual portions of the channel
belong to certain groups only. Different
kinship groups command the night
and day cycles of irrigation whereby
groups get to use the water during
the day and some use it during the
night. The first priority is given
to cereal crops on irrigated terraces,
then potatoes, vegetables and finally
lucerne. This sequence is relaxed
only when sufficient water becomes
available in the channels. At this
time the first watering of the orchards
is allowed. This study also describes
the organizational aspects of water
management whereby the vacuum left
by the abolition of the mir system
has been taken up by village communities
themselves who manage water through
mutual consent and have laid down
an elaborate system of water allocation
and channel supervision.
Traditionally drainage
has not been a problem. Domestic
gray water is thrown onto the land
and drains away. In closely built
homes there are shallow open drains
leading either to a main channel
to a river or to the field. However
it is rare to find water being wasted
since excess is taken up by diversion
to productive use in crops and animals
(Hunzai, 1993).
Communities also
participate in the maintenance of
the common portions of the irrigation
channels. This is usually done during
the spring and farmers contribute
labor or cash towards this goal.
De-silting of channels is also performed
communally. A watchman (chowkidar)
may also be hired by the farmers
to keep an eye on the irrigation
channel, clear it from debris, perform
small repairs and report any problems.
The individual portions of the channel
are maintained by the respective
farmers themselves (Ahmed and Joyia,
2003).
|