Water
Uses in Northern Areas
Domestic water use
Rural: The channels that bring water
for irrigation are also used for
domestic water supply in the rural
areas. According to Muneeba et.
al (1994) most villages use the
same channel for irrigation and
domestic use. In some villages the
people go up the channel to get
water for drinking since they realize
that water passing through the village
can be contaminated. This has a
basis in fact since most of the
channels are open and wastewater
from homes and feces can flow into
them, plus clothes and domestic
utensils are also washed in these
channels. However there are a few
communities that have constructed
separate channels for irrigation
and for drinking water. In such
villages, people cannot wash clothes
or throw wastewater in the irrigation
channels.
Where there is a
scarcity of water, channel water
is stored in a pit locally called
gulk or gulko or chudong. Usually
it is a circular, underground pit
about 10 ft deep with a roof made
of timber and earth. Villagers like
the gulk because
• the water here is cooler
than in the channels
• it reduces the turbidity
in the water
• food items stored near the
gulk remain cool in summer
• it provides a reserve in
case of need
In fact, Muneeba
et al. (1994) found that many villagers
often prefer gulk water over other
water. In the village of Chaprote
Bala, where a piped water supply
scheme is present, some people still
prefer to drink gulk water in summer
over the warmish tap water. Hussain
and Langendijk (1994) report that
in addition to preferring the cooler
temperature of the pit or river
water, some villagers also do not
consider tap water “fresh”
because it stands still in pipes.
In some instances, when the distance
to the communal posts was greater
than to a nearby source of water
such as a channel or pit, it was
found that many villagers preferred
to use water from the proximate
sources.
Muneeba et al. (1994)
also observed that in villages there
were communal and private gulks.
The communal gulk was observed to
be less hygienic whereas the private
gulk was cleaner, with a properly
maintained roof and sometimes with
a door and lock. Hussain and Langendijk
(1994) found that the bacterial
content of gulks was the highest
of all available water sources in
the village. They quote a study
done in over a 100 villages which
found the e-coli content in pit
water between 230-800/100ml (the
WHO standard for developing countries
is less than 10 e-coli/100ml). So
traditionally drinking water has
spread many diseases such as typhoid,
diarrhea and giardia (Hunzai, 1993).
In some villages, like in Jutial,
changing practices have resulted
in some homes constructing cement
water tanks in place of the traditional
gulk.
In the Baltistan
area it is reported that the use
of traditional pits for drinking
and cooking water is less common
than in the Gilgit region. In the
few villages where the water pits
(called chudong) are available they
are shared by the villagers, sometimes
more than 20 households using one
water pit. Also, in summer when
water is available through other
sources, the pit is less in use
but in winter storing and using
water from the pit is more common
(van de Korput et al., 1994).
Therefore the implications
of these findings are that successful
water supply schemes will have the
following features:
a) have convenient
locations for tap connections
b) piped water will be cold, clear
and continuous
c) be technically well designed
and constructed schemes with good
inlet chambers, well protected storage
tanks and sufficient depth of pipe
trenches.
Urban: In the urban
centers of the Northern Areas water
supply systems are based on the
usage of surface waters. Groundwater
usage for domestic supply is prevalent
only in a few places, such as the
low lying areas of Gilgit town (Khalil,
2003).
In most urban
areas water delivery systems have
been around since the early 1980s
but there has been a problem of
continuity and quantity of water
supplied to the homes. Water demand
depends on the socio-economic status
of the population, its density,
the quality of raw water available
and so on (Raza, 2002).
|